Lockdown: Level 1 comes five months too late – DA


  • The DA says President Cyril Ramaphosa’s announcement of a move to Alert Level 1 of the Covid-19 lockdown comes five months too late. 
  • The party says Ramaphosa is to blame for the country’s “socioeconomic devastation”. 
  • It has called on the government to implement wide-ranging, pro-growth economic reforms.

The DA has welcomed President Cyril Ramaphosa’s announcement that Alert Level 1 of the Covid-19 lockdown will be implemented from midnight on Sunday, but says it comes five months too late and that Ramaphosa is to blame for what it calls the country’s “socioeconomical devastation”.

Ramaphosa made the announcement on Wednesday evening and it means that larger gatherings will be permitted, along with international travel, the sale of alcohol from Monday to Friday and a curfew that is extended until midnight.

In his address to the nation, the president said the country had weathered the Covid-19 storm, but he warned of a potential second wave of the pandemic and asked citizens to continue to be vigilant.

DA interim leader John Steenhuisen, however, reckoned it was a case of too little too late.

“Although it has come far too late, we welcome the move to Level 1, including the opening of international borders and lifting of more restrictions on economic and social activity. We repeat our call for the State of Disaster to be ended and the curfew to be lifted fully,” Steenhuisen said, following Ramaphosa’s address.

READ | Ramaphosa announces move to Level 1: ‘Prepare for the new normal’

“Now that the virus is in retreat, we need to take stock. The DA will call for a parliamentary debate and ad hoc committee to assess the government’s management of South Africa’s Covid response. President Ramaphosa and his government must be held to account for the avoidable socioeconomic devastation which is the net impact of lockdown.”

Five months too late

Steenhuisen said most of the economy should have been fully opened five months ago when the DA first called for it.

“It was already clear by mid-April that a severe, prolonged lockdown would have devastating socioeconomic consequences, including thousands of excess deaths to other diseases, millions of livelihoods lost, millions of households plunged deeper into poverty, thousands of businesses destroyed, widening inequality, and billions of rands of tax revenue lost, revenue which should have been pulling people out of poverty.

“Every life lost is a human tragedy. Life lost to poverty, other diseases, gender-based violence, suicide, and depression may be harder to quantify than life lost to Covid, especially as these consequences of lockdown will accrue over decades, rather than months. But less visible is not less valuable,” Steenhuisen said. 

He added that by mid-April, the initial alarming Covid-19 death-toll predictions had already been revised sharply downward and it was already known that Covid-19 did not pose a significant risk to healthy people below the age of 65.


“It is unforgivable that government did not then amend restrictions accordingly to keep the response proportional to the multiple risks we face as a society.

“It had also become abundantly clear by mid-April that lockdown was a luxury South Africa could not afford. Government had amply proved by then that it did not have the capacity to bridge struggling households and businesses over even a three-week lockdown, let alone a six-month lockdown – nor feed hungry schoolchildren. It was also clear by then that millions of people were facing risks from other diseases due to lack of access to vital medication, healthcare, testing and vaccines.”

EXPLAINER | Covid-19 corruption, economic recovery: 10 takeaways from Ramaphosa’s speech

Steenhuisen said it was also clear by mid-April that South Africa’s most vulnerable households – those living in cramped conditions in townships – were not physically able to adhere to lockdown restrictions.

“In other words, that lockdown would not be effective at slowing transmission in large parts of the population. Lockdown is a blunt instrument that should have been replaced five months ago with more targeted interventions to slow the spread of the disease.”

He said that the lockdown was an “unaffordable way to buy ” to prepare South Africa’s healthcare system, “especially as provinces – other than the DA-run Western Cape – failed to use the effectively to build additional capacity”.

“Many eminently qualified people from a variety of disciplines called for an end to lockdown months ago, including vaccinology professors Shabir Mahdi and Glenda Gray, who are on the government’s own Ministerial Advisory Committee.

Ramaphosa’s government can only rescue the situation now by implementing wide-ranging, pro-growth economic reforms to roll back mounting poverty, a pandemic much more deadly than Covid,” Steenhuisen said.

Do you want to know more about this topic? Sign up for one of ‘s 33 newsletters to receive the information you want in your inbox. Special newsletters are available to subscribers.